A prospective cohort study evaluated digital chest X-ray computer-aided detection (CAD) among adult household contacts of patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) in Khayelitsha, South Africa. Recruitment occurred from November 2014 to September 2017, with follow-up until May 2021. The objectives were to assess the diagnostic accuracy of three CAD packages for prevalent and incident pulmonary TB, evaluate recommended CAD thresholds, and compare or combine CAD scores with blood-based biomarkers.
Eligible participants were household contacts aged 18 years or older. Pregnant participants, those already on TB treatment, and those without CAD readings were excluded. At baseline, all participants underwent symptom screening, HIV testing, physical examination, digital posterior-anterior CXR, and microbiological testing regardless of symptoms, using spontaneous and induced sputum samples processed by smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF, and MGIT culture. Three CAD tools were evaluated: CAD4TBv7, qXRv3, and Lunitv3, using thresholds of 50, 0.5, and 0.15, respectively. No participants received preventive therapy, consistent with guidelines at the time. A nested subgroup of HIV-uninfected, asymptomatic participants also underwent CRP, ESR, QuantiFERON-Gold, and 3-gene RNA MTB-HR testing.
Among 483 analyzed participants, median age was 33 years, 61% were female, 23% had previous TB, and 28% were people with HIV. Median follow-up was 4.6 years. Prevalent bacteriologically confirmed TB was found in 23 participants (4.7%), and 38 of 460 participants without prevalent TB later developed incident TB (8.3%). CAD tools performed well for prevalent TB, with AUCs of 0.87 to 0.91 for all prevalent cases, but were less accurate for predicting incident TB from baseline CXR, with AUCs of 0.60 to 0.65. At recommended thresholds, sensitivity and specificity for all prevalent TB were 0.70/0.93 for CAD4TBv7, 0.57/0.94 for qXRv3, and 0.87/0.86 for Lunitv3, compared with 0.61/0.87 for human CXR reading. CAD accuracy was better in participants without previous TB. In the biomarker subgroup, CAD outperformed blood biomarkers for asymptomatic prevalent TB, and adding blood biomarkers did not significantly improve detection of prevalent or incident TB.
Overall, CAD-based CXR screening was useful for detecting prevalent TB among adult RR-TB household contacts, including asymptomatic cases, but had limited ability to predict future incident TB. Key limitations include a single high-burden setting, exclusion of children and pregnant participants, incomplete follow-up sputum rescreening, and reduced generalizability to populations receiving preventive therapy.
Source: Macpherson L, Kik SV, Quartagno M, Lakay F, Jaftha M, Yende N, Galant S, Aziz S, Daroowala R, Court R, Taliep A. Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray computer-aided detection software for detection of prevalent and incident tuberculosis in household contacts. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2025 Mar 15;80(3):626-36.