A nationwide retrospective cohort study examined whether statin use was associated with a lower risk of tuberculosis (TB), including whether the association differed according to diabetes status. The investigators conducted a propensity score-matched analysis using South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service databases from 2003 through 2013. These databases represent people of all ages and regions across South Korea and contain sociodemographic information, diagnoses, deaths, prescriptions, and insured medical service use.
Among 1,025,340 people in the National Health Insurance cohort, the researchers identified 125,841 new statin users with a first-ever statin prescription between 2003 and 2013. After excluding 189 people younger than 18 years and 2,184 who died or emigrated within 7 days of cohort entry, 123,468 statin users remained. Potential controls were drawn from 569,999 participants in the medical-checkup cohort. After excluding previous statin users, people younger than 18 years, and those who died or emigrated within 7 days, 439,546 never-users were eligible. Propensity scores were estimated at statin initiation for users and at the first medical checkup in the corresponding year for nonusers. Matching produced 28,018 statin users and 28,018 nonusers, with standardized differences below 10% for all adjusted variables. Analyses considered 22 covariates, including age, sex, socioeconomic characteristics, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, renal and pulmonary disease, rheumatoid disease, malignancy, and cardiovascular disease. The definition used to identify incident TB was not specified in the supplied text.
In the unmatched population, crude TB incidence was similar between groups: 168 cases during 158,491 person-years among statin users, or 1.06 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.22), compared with 2,845 cases during 3,026,596 person-years among nonusers, or 0.94 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.98). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.23). After adjustment for 22 covariates, statin use was associated with a lower TB risk (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.74). In the propensity score-matched analysis, 30 TB cases occurred among statin users during 30,303 person-years, compared with 235 cases among nonusers during 167,857 person-years. Incidence was 0.99 versus 1.40 per 1,000 person-years, corresponding to an HR of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.98). The association weakened after statin discontinuation. In the matched analysis, the HR was 0.73 within 1 month after discontinuation (95% CI, 0.51 to 1.05) and 1.00 within 6 months (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.38). Diabetes modified the association in the matched analysis. Among participants without diabetes, statin use was associated with substantially lower TB risk, with 7 versus 147 cases and an HR of 0.28 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.60). Among those with diabetes, there was no evidence of reduced risk, with 23 versus 88 cases and an HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.67). The interaction was statistically significant (P for interaction = 0.003). Statin use was also associated with lower TB risk among patients with cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.92), but not clearly among those without cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.23), although the interaction was not significant.
In conclusion, statin use was associated with a modestly lower incidence of TB after extensive adjustment and propensity score matching, but this association was concentrated among people without diabetes and appeared to diminish after statin discontinuation. Because this was an observational claims-based study, it cannot establish that statins prevent TB. Residual confounding, differences between the insurance and medical-checkup cohorts, exposure misclassification, and the small number of TB events in several matched subgroups may limit precision and causal interpretation.
Source: Kim MC, Yun SC, Lee SO, Choi SH, Kim YS, Woo JH, Kim SH. Association between Tuberculosis, Statin Use, and Diabetes: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2019 Aug 1;101(2):350-356.