Who
-
Participants: 103 patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).
-
Groups:
-
26 patients received bedaquiline (Bdq) with delamanid
-
77 patients received Bdq without delamanid
-
-
Key characteristics: Diabetes mellitus was significantly more common in the Bdq–delamanid group (61.5% vs. 29.9%).
-
Exclusions: Patients with baseline QTc >470 ms, hypoalbuminemia, electrolyte disturbances, hyperthyroidism, HIV, renal failure, or heart disease treated with furosemide/digoxin.
What
-
Focus: Comparison of efficacy (AFB sputum conversion and culture conversion) and safety (QTc interval prolongation) between Bdq-containing regimens with vs. without delamanid.
-
Findings:
-
No statistically significant differences in AFB conversion, culture conversion, or QTc interval changes between groups.
-
Time to AFB and culture conversion was numerically faster in the Bdq–delamanid group, but not significant.
-
QTc prolongation incidence was lower in the Bdq–delamanid group, but also not significant.
-
-
Conclusion: Regimens containing Bdq with delamanid demonstrated similar efficacy and safety compared with Bdq regimens without delamanid.
When
-
Study period: January 2021 to July 2023.
-
Follow-up: Clinical, microbiological, and QTc data monitored up to the 6th month of treatment.
Where
-
Setting: Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Indonesia.
Why
-
To evaluate whether adding delamanid to Bdq-based individualized MDR-TB regimens improves treatment outcomes or increases cardiac risk, particularly when drugs from Groups A and B are limited or cannot be used.
How
-
Design: Observational analytic study with a retrospective approach.
-
Sampling: Convenience sampling of complete medical records.
-
Diagnostics: MDR-TB confirmed using GeneXpert MTB/RIF, line probe assays, and MGIT 960 culture-based drug susceptibility testing.
-
Outcomes measured:
-
AFB sputum conversion
-
Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture conversion
-
QTc interval changes and QTc prolongation (≥470 ms)
-
-
Analysis: Comparative statistical analysis between the two treatment groups across monthly evaluations.
Overall interpretation:
An individualized MDR-TB regimen containing bedaquiline with delamanid provides comparable efficacy and safety to regimens without delamanid. Delamanid may be a preferred Group C option when drugs from Groups A and B are unavailable or unsuitable.
Sumber: Soedarsono, S., Mertaniasih, N.M., Kusmiati, T., Permatasari, A., Subay, S. and Adiono, S.H., 2024. Comparison of Individual Regimen Containing Bedaquiline with Delamanid and Bedaquiline without Delamanid on Efficacy and Safety in Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Patients: Implementation in Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Indonesia. The International Journal of Mycobacteriology, 13(2), pp.140-146.
No comments:
Post a Comment